Difference between revisions of "Fedora 7 Installation Guide"

From cchtml.com
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Fedora Core 7 Installation Guide moved to Fedora 7 Installation Guide: It is *not* named Fedora Core anymore. Simply "Fedora".)
(8.38.7 update)
Line 1: Line 1:
Unfortunaly, the current ATI driver (8.37.6) is not compatible with the X server part of the FC7 distribution
+
Unfortunaly, the previous ATI driver (8.37.6), nor the current ATI driver (8.38.6), or even the hotfix (8.38.7) are compatible with the X server in the FC7 distribution.
 +
 
 +
As pointed out at Phoronix.com, the latest release (8.38.6) has very little changes and completely ignored Fedora 7 users who have waited over a month for a functional driver.
 +
 
 +
"The AMD 8.38.6 display driver had introduced Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 packaging support along with fixing a few bugs, but the driver was one of the least interesting releases in recent times."
 +
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=764&num=1
 +
 
 +
Given that this release focuses on packaging support, ATI are still prioritising cosmetic changes over functional aspects.  Whilst packages are a 'nice to have', basic functionality is far more critical.  As a result, ATI has lost substantial revenue to their rival's, NVIDIA, as value-added resellers and consultants cannot recommend ATI-based products in cross-OS environments.

Revision as of 10:35, 29 June 2007

Unfortunaly, the previous ATI driver (8.37.6), nor the current ATI driver (8.38.6), or even the hotfix (8.38.7) are compatible with the X server in the FC7 distribution.

As pointed out at Phoronix.com, the latest release (8.38.6) has very little changes and completely ignored Fedora 7 users who have waited over a month for a functional driver.

"The AMD 8.38.6 display driver had introduced Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 packaging support along with fixing a few bugs, but the driver was one of the least interesting releases in recent times." http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=764&num=1

Given that this release focuses on packaging support, ATI are still prioritising cosmetic changes over functional aspects. Whilst packages are a 'nice to have', basic functionality is far more critical. As a result, ATI has lost substantial revenue to their rival's, NVIDIA, as value-added resellers and consultants cannot recommend ATI-based products in cross-OS environments.