Difference between revisions of "Fedora 7 Installation Guide"

From cchtml.com
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "Fedora 7 Installation Guide": Excessive vandalism ([edit=autoconfirmed] (expires 17:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)) [move=autoconfirmed] (expires 17:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC))))
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Unfortunaly, the previous ATI driver (8.37.6), nor the current ATI driver (8.38.6), or even the hotfix (8.38.7) are compatible with the X server in the FC7 distribution.
+
Installation on Fedora 7 is easy: Download the latest fglrx driver, apply it an executable permission, and run it.
 +
There are basically 2 options:
 +
    1: Install the driver
 +
    2: Generate distribution specific package
  
As pointed out at Phoronix.com, the latest release (8.38.6) has very little changes and completely ignored Fedora 7 users who have waited over a month for a functional driver.
+
Choice one installs the driver and second choice generates rpm according to your system and puts them in working directory
 +
 
 +
 
 +
--------
 +
 
 +
 
 +
After the newest ATI catalyst release (8.39.4), fglrx module can be installed on new Xorg (7.2). Unfortunately, the previous ATI driver (8.37.6), nor the latter one (8.38.6), or even the hotfix (8.38.7) were compatible with the X server in the Fedora 7 distribution.
 +
 
 +
As pointed out at Phoronix.com, the latest release (8.39.4) has very little changes and completely ignored Fedora 7 users who have waited over a month for a functional driver.
  
 
"The AMD 8.38.6 display driver had introduced Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 packaging support along with fixing a few bugs, but the driver was one of the least interesting releases in recent times."
 
"The AMD 8.38.6 display driver had introduced Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 packaging support along with fixing a few bugs, but the driver was one of the least interesting releases in recent times."
 
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=764&num=1
 
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=764&num=1
  
Given that this release focuses on packaging support, ATI are still prioritising cosmetic changes over functional aspects.  Whilst packages are a 'nice to have', basic functionality is far more critical.
+
Given that this release focuses on packaging support, ATI are still prioritizing cosmetic changes over functional aspects.  Whilst packages are a 'nice to have', basic functionality is far more critical.
  
However there exists a [http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=156961 workaround]. You can get the driver working by installing an older version of the X server which is compatible with the current ATI driver and then compiling the driver. The disadvantages are obvious: No updates for the X server, bugs and security holes of the old X version remain unfixed. Further you could break package dependencies and block updates of other packages. Although there's a step by step howto you could get into serious trouble if you do not understand what you are doing.
+
[[Category:Installation Documentation]]

Latest revision as of 12:31, 22 January 2012

Installation on Fedora 7 is easy: Download the latest fglrx driver, apply it an executable permission, and run it. There are basically 2 options:

   1: Install the driver
   2: Generate distribution specific package

Choice one installs the driver and second choice generates rpm according to your system and puts them in working directory




After the newest ATI catalyst release (8.39.4), fglrx module can be installed on new Xorg (7.2). Unfortunately, the previous ATI driver (8.37.6), nor the latter one (8.38.6), or even the hotfix (8.38.7) were compatible with the X server in the Fedora 7 distribution.

As pointed out at Phoronix.com, the latest release (8.39.4) has very little changes and completely ignored Fedora 7 users who have waited over a month for a functional driver.

"The AMD 8.38.6 display driver had introduced Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 packaging support along with fixing a few bugs, but the driver was one of the least interesting releases in recent times." http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=764&num=1

Given that this release focuses on packaging support, ATI are still prioritizing cosmetic changes over functional aspects. Whilst packages are a 'nice to have', basic functionality is far more critical.