Talk:Debian: Difference between revisions

From cchtml.com
m (Undo revision 8041 by 31.36.152.104 (talk))
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Reverted to spamless version
Did anyone _ever_ tried successfully to build a debian packet since about 2009???
I've used the --keep keyword of the installer and watched the code. This is ridiculous:
 
#Detect x* dir name corresponding to X_NAME
    case ${X_NAME} in
        woody|3.0) echo "Error: ${X_NAME} is no longer supported by this installer" ; exit 1 ;;
        etch|stable|4.0) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=etch;;
        lenny|testing) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=lenny;;
        sid|unstable) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=sid;;
        experimental) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=experimental;;
        *) echo "Error: invalid package name passed to --buildpkg" ; exit 1 ;;
    esac
 
 
Besides the fact that lenny hasn't been testing for a long time now, there isn't a X_DIR "x710" in this whole packet thus you don't need to wonder about it is failing all the time with the error:
"cp: cannot stat `/tmp/fglrx-install.1GJKvS/x710_64a/*': No such file or directory"

Revision as of 17:45, 12 July 2012

Did anyone _ever_ tried successfully to build a debian packet since about 2009??? I've used the --keep keyword of the installer and watched the code. This is ridiculous:

  1. Detect x* dir name corresponding to X_NAME
   case ${X_NAME} in
       woody|3.0) echo "Error: ${X_NAME} is no longer supported by this installer" ; exit 1 ;;
       etch|stable|4.0) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=etch;;
       lenny|testing) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=lenny;;
       sid|unstable) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=sid;;
       experimental) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=experimental;;
       *) echo "Error: invalid package name passed to --buildpkg" ; exit 1 ;;
   esac


Besides the fact that lenny hasn't been testing for a long time now, there isn't a X_DIR "x710" in this whole packet thus you don't need to wonder about it is failing all the time with the error: "cp: cannot stat `/tmp/fglrx-install.1GJKvS/x710_64a/*': No such file or directory"