Editing Talk:Glxgears is not a Benchmark

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
 
this leads to the obvious questions:
 
this leads to the obvious questions:
  
* what '''is''' a benchmark? please could someone provide links..
+
* what '''is''' a benchmark? please could someone provide a link..
 
* where can I get a list of benchmarks using something better than glxgears?
 
* where can I get a list of benchmarks using something better than glxgears?
  
==Rather depends on how you define benchmark..==
+
== Real Benchmarks ==
Glxgears -is- a benchmark if you are comparing the same hardware before and after a change. People have been parroting the 'is not a benchmark' line irrespective of -what- is being measured for so long now that it is getting tedious.
 
It is only 'not a benchmark' if you are comparing different hardware, or posting 'l33t' framerates on a forum.
 
Glxgears is an excellent benchmark if you are doing a before and after test of your system when updating something like display drivers or Xorg, or if trying a config change that is supposed to improve 3d performance.
 
Supposing you got 500fps before a change, and still get 500fps after. Then it is a sure sign that whatever you have done does not improve performance on your hardware (of course it may have additional benefits, stability etc..)
 
If, however, you get 500fps before you upgrade the display drivers, and then get 700fps afterwards, then you have successfully used glxgears to benchmark your system and demonstrate a 40% speed improvement merely by upgrading some software. Of course that may not translate to a real-world improvement of 40%, but do you think it shows that nothing has changed?
 
:How about saying 'Glxgears is not a benchmark for comparing dissimilar systems' 
 
  
 +
I'll add a list to the page. I'll start with two, but feel free to expand it. There are dozens of benchmarks. I don't see how people can't find them. Please sign your comments. -[[User:Mooninite|Mooninite]] 13:52, 1 March 2008 (CST)
  
I found just what I was neeedd, and it was entertaining!
+
== FIELD_OTHER ==
  
 
+
FIELD_MESSAGE_aloutrdelr
The ubiqine link is dead, and seems to be a closed-source x86 only commercial demo. We need
 
1) Open source!
 
2) Multi-platform
 
 
 
I am for instance wanting to benchmark Power VR 3D accelerators found in high-end Omap (CortexV8) CPUs.
 
:I've updated the links, but come on, it's easy to find them on the site. As for OMAP devices, this wiki is *not* for ARM devices. It is for '''x86 desktop computers'''. If you want an ARM benchmark, compile Quake 3, which is available for [http://maemo.org Maemo 5], if you want an ARM7 (Cortex A8) binary. --[[User:Mooninite|Mooninite]] 11:22, 9 November 2011 (CST)
 

Please note that all contributions to cchtml.com are considered to be released under the Public Domain (see cchtml.com:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)