Difference between revisions of "Talk:Red Hat Enterprise Linux"

From cchtml.com
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Talk:Red Hat Enterprise moved to Talk:Red Hat Enterprise Linux: The proper way to refer to this distribution is Red Hat Enterprise Linux)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
* RHEL 5 support has been out for a couple of months by now. It is after all one of only two Linux distributions officially supported by AMD.
 
* RHEL 5 support has been out for a couple of months by now. It is after all one of only two Linux distributions officially supported by AMD.
 
[[User:Riaanvn|Riaanvn]] 23:06, 1 November 2007 (CDT)
 
[[User:Riaanvn|Riaanvn]] 23:06, 1 November 2007 (CDT)
 +
 +
== A yum repository? ==
 +
Is there some yum repository with FGLRX drivers for RHEL/CentOS 5? I know that for Fedora there is Livna, but it does not support RHEL/CentOS. I know that for NVIDIA drivers, there is ATrpms, but it does not include FGLRX drivers :-(

Latest revision as of 16:26, 20 August 2008

There doesn't seem to be support for RHEL 5 (and therefore no support for CentOS 5 either). When will this happen? RHEL 5 beta has been out for some time now.

  • RHEL 5 support has been out for a couple of months by now. It is after all one of only two Linux distributions officially supported by AMD.

Riaanvn 23:06, 1 November 2007 (CDT)

A yum repository?[edit]

Is there some yum repository with FGLRX drivers for RHEL/CentOS 5? I know that for Fedora there is Livna, but it does not support RHEL/CentOS. I know that for NVIDIA drivers, there is ATrpms, but it does not include FGLRX drivers :-(