<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://wiki.cchtml.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=183.179.38.123</id>
	<title>cchtml.com - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://wiki.cchtml.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=183.179.38.123"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/183.179.38.123"/>
	<updated>2026-05-16T12:18:05Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Ubuntu_Precise_Installation_Guide&amp;diff=9648</id>
		<title>Ubuntu Precise Installation Guide</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Ubuntu_Precise_Installation_Guide&amp;diff=9648"/>
		<updated>2013-01-29T15:05:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;183.179.38.123: Undo revision 9354 by 141.131.3.55 (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I don&#039;t mind it being closed soruce, to be honest. I just think it shouldn&#039;t be called  Ubuntu One . Ubuntu means humanity to others, which implies community and freedom, both of which do not apply to  Ubuntu One . Why not call it  Canonical One  or something?You know how annoying it is when programs call themselves  Open Source  when they&#039;re clearly not, according to the OSI? That&#039;s the way I feel about Ubuntu One. It&#039;s clearly not in the same spirit as Ubuntu, according to the Ubuntu promise, the Ubuntu philosophy and the Ubuntu trademark policy.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>183.179.38.123</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>