<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://wiki.cchtml.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=211.46.97.1</id>
	<title>cchtml.com - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://wiki.cchtml.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=211.46.97.1"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/211.46.97.1"/>
	<updated>2026-04-29T04:27:30Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Ubuntu_Jaunty_Installation_Guide&amp;diff=7057</id>
		<title>Ubuntu Jaunty Installation Guide</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Ubuntu_Jaunty_Installation_Guide&amp;diff=7057"/>
		<updated>2011-07-14T16:07:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;211.46.97.1: SnOOHWBeQiQkYSvKoTI&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;What a joy to find such clear thinking. Thanks for potsnig!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>211.46.97.1</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Talk:Glxgears_is_not_a_Benchmark&amp;diff=7001</id>
		<title>Talk:Glxgears is not a Benchmark</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Talk:Glxgears_is_not_a_Benchmark&amp;diff=7001"/>
		<updated>2011-07-14T00:41:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;211.46.97.1: /* FoPLQrZr */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;this leads to the obvious questions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* what &#039;&#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039;&#039; a benchmark? please could someone provide a link..&lt;br /&gt;
* where can I get a list of benchmarks using something better than glxgears?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rather depends on how you define benchmark..==&lt;br /&gt;
Glxgears -is- a benchmark if you are comparing the same hardware before and after a change. People have been parroting the &#039;is not a benchmark&#039; line irrespective of -what- is being measured for so long now that it is getting tedious. &lt;br /&gt;
It is only &#039;not a benchmark&#039; if you are comparing different hardware, or posting &#039;l33t&#039; framerates on a forum.&lt;br /&gt;
Glxgears is an excellent benchmark if you are doing a before and after test of your system when updating something like display drivers or Xorg, or if trying a config change that is supposed to improve 3d performance.&lt;br /&gt;
Supposing you got 500fps before a change, and still get 500fps after. Then it is a sure sign that whatever you have done does not improve performance on your hardware (of course it may have additional benefits, stability etc..) &lt;br /&gt;
If, however, you get 500fps before you upgrade the display drivers, and then get 700fps afterwards, then you have successfully used glxgears to benchmark your system and demonstrate a 40% speed improvement merely by upgrading some software. Of course that may not translate to a real-world improvement of 40%, but do you think it shows that nothing has changed?&lt;br /&gt;
:How about saying &#039;Glxgears is not a benchmark for comparing dissimilar systems&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found just what I was neeedd, and it was entertaining!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FoPLQrZr ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very true! Makes a chnage to see someone spell it out like that. :)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>211.46.97.1</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>