<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://wiki.cchtml.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=61.152.176.48</id>
	<title>cchtml.com - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://wiki.cchtml.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=61.152.176.48"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/61.152.176.48"/>
	<updated>2026-05-15T10:52:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Fedora_16_Installation_Guide&amp;diff=8684</id>
		<title>Fedora 16 Installation Guide</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Fedora_16_Installation_Guide&amp;diff=8684"/>
		<updated>2012-06-22T06:59:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;61.152.176.48: tkxryKWEXYK&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I have to agree that the Gnome project bgeard ahead torpedos be damned with radical changes to the hardware requirements (and this was probably the deal-breaker for Ubuntu), as well as usability. Fair enough: it&#039;s their project, and they provide it to the community free of charge on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.KDE 4x was certainly not without it&#039;s teething pains in hardware compatibility, stability and usability. It has since matured into a plausible contender, and Gnome has some catching up to do.Surely what isn&#039;t fair is expecting a hardware vendor (like AMD) to anticipate these wild vicissitudes and be all over that with unlimited technical support. There are free radeon drivers available and yes, performance-wise they absolutely suck. I suppose that is AMD&#039;s fault too? One can also choose not to use Gnome 3 until it gets its act together, and for some that is surely more feasible than going out and splurging on a new platform. There&#039;s a reason why some gravitate towards free software: It&#039;s free. It doesn&#039;t cost anything. Um  yeah I think that about sums it up. Your proposed  solution  turns out to be rather expensive, compared to the alternatives. Thus defeating the point of this exercise? Think about it.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>61.152.176.48</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>