http://wiki.cchtml.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=64.253.129.134 2026-04-30T22:21:07Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.43.1 http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fedora_Core_4_Installation_Guide&diff=1771 2006-04-12T19:20:36Z

<p>64.253.129.134: </p> <hr /> <div>The livna.org package is a 3rd party installer. If the person feels it is worthy enough, why don't they work with ATI to create a better installer for all of us? I do not feel that it should stay at the top because it is from a 3rd party. The true source of the driver (ATI.com) needs to be shown before hand. &quot;Security by obscurity&quot; doesn't work, what makes you think &quot;download by obscurity&quot; will?<br /> <br /> For me, the ATI script installer is the easiest and has worked every time. My xorg.conf file is a default file (no ATI configuration what-so-ever in the DEVICE field). With aticonfig... the livna package is dated and not really needed.<br /> <br /> <br /> This is assuming that the ati installer works. It's obvious you don't use a 64 bit distro with a 2.6.16 or newer kernel as the installer simply does not compile the kernel module for those kernels. ATI hasn't fixed this for at least the last 2 driver releases as well as there being kernel module compiling issues on previous kernels.</div>

64.253.129.134