Talk:Troubleshooting: Difference between revisions
m (Reverted edits by 80.64.80.247 (talk) to last revision by 82.136.251.186) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I found that on my system (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, upgraded from 9.10, using a Radeon 5850), it was necessary in Synaptic to deselect the''' ati related''' xserver-xorg-... packages (search for 'ati') and only selecting the fglrx driver and fglrx-amdcccle. I am using the closed source driver for multi monitor support, but when using this driver (either from Synaptic or downloaded from ati and installed by shell script), no graphic acceleration and/or peculiar artifacts occurred. | I found that on my system (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, upgraded from 9.10, using a Radeon 5850), it was necessary in Synaptic to deselect the''' ati related''' xserver-xorg-... packages (search for 'ati') and only selecting the fglrx driver and fglrx-amdcccle. I am using the closed source driver for multi monitor support, but when using this driver (either from Synaptic or downloaded from ati and installed by shell script), no graphic acceleration and/or peculiar artifacts occurred. | ||
On Ubuntu 11.10, installing the proprietatary ATI drivers brands the screen with a "Unsuported Hardware" layer which cannot be removed unless the driver is un-installed. Other than that, the driver works great. The standard driver is glitchy but doesn't brand the screen - is no-one aware of this? | |||
Revision as of 20:46, 14 December 2011
I found that on my system (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, upgraded from 9.10, using a Radeon 5850), it was necessary in Synaptic to deselect the ati related xserver-xorg-... packages (search for 'ati') and only selecting the fglrx driver and fglrx-amdcccle. I am using the closed source driver for multi monitor support, but when using this driver (either from Synaptic or downloaded from ati and installed by shell script), no graphic acceleration and/or peculiar artifacts occurred.
On Ubuntu 11.10, installing the proprietatary ATI drivers brands the screen with a "Unsuported Hardware" layer which cannot be removed unless the driver is un-installed. Other than that, the driver works great. The standard driver is glitchy but doesn't brand the screen - is no-one aware of this?
