Slackware: Difference between revisions

From cchtml.com
(sVoMnuUioCjpfN)
m (Reverted edits by 66.228.50.170 (talk) to last revision by Spina)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi there,On November 5th 2007 at 10:58, Martin made a _very_ nice comment on the geernal philosophy behind Slackware   as opposed to other distros. This comment adds the necessary (but lacking) balance to the article  for others to make a qualified choice.On November 6th 2007 at 12:37, icebox added what I'd call an important footnote to Martins comment.Having not read any of the other articles (yet), I must say that I find this one amazingly well done. To me, saving newbees from a poor Linux-experience (due to a chemistry mismatch) is equally important as gaining new territories/disciples to our Slackware community. -And I think that your article might do just that. Hopefully then, potential future Slackware-fans will find the right encouragement (not provided in the article) from those comments.To stick with the  cars and motorcycles  -analogy, I agree that there's no need to bash eachothers distros  choose the vehicle/color/make that best suits your taste; and then respect those traffic lights  ;o)Keep it up!The Guffer
<!-- Per http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Slackware -->
 
[[Category:Distributions]]
Welcome. This bare-bone little FAQ details how to get fglrx working on Slackware, Slackware64 and 64 bit porting.
 
Enjoy!
 
*[[Slackware: ATI SlackBuild (ENG)|ATI SlackBuild (ENG)]]
*[[Slackware: ATI SlackBuild (ITA)|ATI SlackBuild (ITA)]]
 
{{VCT}}

Revision as of 19:10, 16 March 2013

Welcome. This bare-bone little FAQ details how to get fglrx working on Slackware, Slackware64 and 64 bit porting.

Enjoy!


Distribution Neutral Steps

Verifying | Configuring | Troubleshooting