Talk:Debian: Difference between revisions
From cchtml.com
No edit summary |
(→xserver 1.12.3-1: new section) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Besides the fact that lenny hasn't been testing for a long time now, there isn't a X_DIR "x710" in this whole packet thus you don't need to wonder about it is failing all the time with the error: | Besides the fact that lenny hasn't been testing for a long time now, there isn't a X_DIR "x710" in this whole packet thus you don't need to wonder about it is failing all the time with the error: | ||
"cp: cannot stat `/tmp/fglrx-install.1GJKvS/x710_64a/*': No such file or directory" | "cp: cannot stat `/tmp/fglrx-install.1GJKvS/x710_64a/*': No such file or directory" | ||
== xserver 1.12.3-1 == | |||
This was rumored to address the segfaults. Does anyone have experience with this version? | |||
Revision as of 17:54, 24 July 2012
Did anyone _ever_ tried successfully to build a debian packet since about 2009??? I've used the --keep keyword of the installer and watched the code. This is ridiculous:
- Detect x* dir name corresponding to X_NAME
case ${X_NAME} in
woody|3.0) echo "Error: ${X_NAME} is no longer supported by this installer" ; exit 1 ;;
etch|stable|4.0) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=etch;;
lenny|testing) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=lenny;;
sid|unstable) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=sid;;
experimental) X_DIR=x710; X_NAME=experimental;;
*) echo "Error: invalid package name passed to --buildpkg" ; exit 1 ;;
esac
Besides the fact that lenny hasn't been testing for a long time now, there isn't a X_DIR "x710" in this whole packet thus you don't need to wonder about it is failing all the time with the error:
"cp: cannot stat `/tmp/fglrx-install.1GJKvS/x710_64a/*': No such file or directory"
xserver 1.12.3-1
This was rumored to address the segfaults. Does anyone have experience with this version?
